Author summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irene Adeline Milanez results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Recency Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 503 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (8,497 of 8,712 authors). This Irene Adeline Milanez is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Irene Adeline Milanez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠3%Irene Adeline Milanez (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,608
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751002.5% percentile
0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos