Author summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Insha Rahman results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 833 hits. Analysis detected 4,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (1,471 of 6,730 authors). This Insha Rahman is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Insha Rahman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠79%Insha Rahman (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Insha Rahman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Insha Rahman vs sitewide
Insha Rahman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos