Author summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inlander Staff results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 918 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,707 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (2,708 of 6,038 authors). This Inlander Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Inlander Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠56%Inlander Staff (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,707
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Inlander Staff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Inlander Staff vs sitewide
Inlander Staff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos