Author summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Events Media Group results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 1,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (2,962 of 8,469 authors). This Human Events Media Group is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Human Events Media Group
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠65%Human Events Media Group (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,400
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Events Media Group attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Events Media Group vs sitewide
Human Events Media Group attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos