Author summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hien An Ngo results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (2,327 of 8,345 authors). This Hien An Ngo is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Hien An Ngo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠73%Hien An Ngo (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hien An Ngo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hien An Ngo vs sitewide
Hien An Ngo attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos