Author summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 1,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hekmat Aboukhater results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 729 hits . Analysis detected 4,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,862 of 8,584 authors). This Hekmat Aboukhater is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Hekmat Aboukhater
Author details
Total words: 5,280
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.8% 13.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 9.5% 9.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst