Author summary
70%1 analyzed article/video1,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hekmat Aboukhater results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 729 hits. Analysis detected 4,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,862 of 8,584 authors). This Hekmat Aboukhater is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Hekmat Aboukhater
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
67%Hekmat Aboukhater (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,280
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.8%13.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 9.5%9.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos