Author summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video2,124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gwen Ihnat results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 822 hits. Analysis detected 2,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (7,570 of 8,287 authors). This Gwen Ihnat is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Gwen Ihnat
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠9%Gwen Ihnat (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,496
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Gwen Ihnat attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Gwen Ihnat vs sitewide
Gwen Ihnat attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos