Author summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,437 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (1,225 of 4,797 authors). This Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠0%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠1%Jason Karaian1%
⁠75%Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio (selected)5%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,437
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio vs All Other Publications
Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos