Author summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fox19 staff results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (2,060 of 8,320 authors). This Fox19 staff is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Fox19 staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠76%Fox19 staff (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 972
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Fox19 staff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Fox19 staff vs sitewide
Fox19 staff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos