Author summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flynn Snyder results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 117 hits . Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,505 of 9,471 authors). This Flynn Snyder is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Flynn Snyder
Author details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst