Author summary
55% 2 analyzed articles/videos 960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fin Daniel Gómez results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 348 hits . Analysis detected 2,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,638 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,011 of 8,974 authors). This Fin Daniel Gómez is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Fin Daniel Gómez
Author details
Total words: 5,638
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst