Author summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan W. Houk results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (3,406 of 8,355 authors). This Evan W. Houk is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Evan W. Houk
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠60%Evan W. Houk (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,940
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Evan W. Houk attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Evan W. Houk vs sitewide
Evan W. Houk attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos