Author summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,049 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Clabough/University of Virginia results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 3,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (2,833 of 8,352 authors). This Erin Clabough/University of Virginia is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Erin Clabough/University of Virginia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠67%Erin Clabough/University of Virginia (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Erin Clabough/University of Virginia attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Erin Clabough/University of Virginia vs sitewide
Erin Clabough/University of Virginia attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos