BS Summary: These Erik Pedersen results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 591 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (2,976 of 4,520 authors). This Erik Pedersen is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Erik Pedersen
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Erik Pedersen attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Erik Pedersen vs All Other Publications
Erik Pedersen attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.