Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Erik Lin-Greenberg results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Hindsight Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 447 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,944 authors). This Erik Lin-Greenberg is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Erik Lin-Greenberg
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Erik Lin-Greenberg attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Erik Lin-Greenberg vs sitewide
Erik Lin-Greenberg attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.