Author summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Sondermann results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 902 hits . Analysis detected 3,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,891 of 8,706 authors). This Eric Sondermann is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group. Eric Sondermann
Author details
Total words: 3,536
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.3% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 25.5% 25.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 25.5%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst