Author summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video1,552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Gallegos results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 4,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,309 of 5,774 authors). This Emma Gallegos is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Emma Gallegos
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠60%Emma Gallegos (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,656
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emma Gallegos attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emma Gallegos vs sitewide
Emma Gallegos attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos