Author summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video1,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Piper-Vallillo results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (7,114 of 8,357 authors). This Emily Piper-Vallillo is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Emily Piper-Vallillo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠15%Emily Piper-Vallillo (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,124
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emily Piper-Vallillo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emily Piper-Vallillo vs sitewide
Emily Piper-Vallillo attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos