BS Summary: These Emily Forlini results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 522 hits. Analysis detected 4,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (3,654 of 4,520 authors). This Emily Forlini is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Emily Forlini
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠20%Emily Forlini (selected)2%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 7,004
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emily Forlini attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emily Forlini vs All Other Publications
Emily Forlini attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.