Author summary
17%1 analyzed article/video2,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Cataneo results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 591 hits. Analysis detected 3,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (7,585 of 8,457 authors). This Emily Cataneo is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Emily Cataneo
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emily Cataneo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emily Cataneo vs sitewide
Emily Cataneo attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.