Author summary
ā 17%1 analyzed article/video1,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Bader results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ā 22% (6,607 of 8,429 authors). This Emily Bader is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Emily Bader
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 22%Emily Bader (selected)2%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,720
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emily Bader attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emily Bader vs sitewide
Emily Bader attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos