Author summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 1,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emerson Drewes results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 264 hits . Analysis detected 1,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 27% (6,399 of 8,706 authors). This Emerson Drewes is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. Emerson Drewes
Author details
Total words: 4,260
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst