Author summary
⁠24%1 analyzed article/video1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dylan Goforth results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (6,844 of 8,323 authors). This Dylan Goforth is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Dylan Goforth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠18%Dylan Goforth (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dylan Goforth attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dylan Goforth vs sitewide
Dylan Goforth attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos