Author summary
92%4 analyzed articles/videos3,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doktor Zoom results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 3,703 hits. Analysis detected 16,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,096 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,892 of 8,378 authors). This Doktor Zoom is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Doktor Zoom
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
66%Doktor Zoom (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,096
Article count: 4
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Doktor Zoom attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Doktor Zoom vs sitewide
Doktor Zoom attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.