Author summary
54%1 analyzed article/video2,876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Shiffman results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,117 hits. Analysis detected 6,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,694 of 6,509 authors). This David Shiffman is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
David Shiffman
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Shiffman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Shiffman vs sitewide
David Shiffman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.