Author summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David Pierce results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 287 hits. Analysis detected 1,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This David Pierce is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
David Pierce
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
ā 0%David Pierce (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,784
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos