Author summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Phillip results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 1,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,551 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (1,667 of 5,295 authors). This David Phillip is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
David Phillip
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠69%David Phillip (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,551
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Phillip attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Phillip vs sitewide
David Phillip attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos