Author summary
100%1 analyzed article/video1,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Moscrop results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 1,621 hits. Analysis detected 10,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,570 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 92% (454 of 5,453 authors). This David Moscrop is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
David Moscrop
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Moscrop attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Moscrop vs sitewide
David Moscrop attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.