Author summary
â 48%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David M. Drucker results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 322 faulty-reasoning hits from 204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of â 96% (215 of 5,061 authors). This David M. Drucker is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
David M. Drucker
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David M. Drucker attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David M. Drucker vs sitewide
David M. Drucker attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.