Author summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Lindfield results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 4,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (1,864 of 7,149 authors). This David Lindfield is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
David Lindfield
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠0%Ken Armstrong1%
⁠1%Franziska Wild1%
⁠74%David Lindfield (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,340
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Lindfield attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Lindfield vs sitewide
David Lindfield attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos