Author summary
â 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David Imel results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Hindsight Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 3,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 5,222 authors). This David Imel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
David Imel
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Imel attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Imel vs sitewide
David Imel attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.