Author summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hogberg results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,478 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (2,288 of 6,630 authors). This David Hogberg is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
David Hogberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠66%David Hogberg (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,478
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Hogberg attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Hogberg vs sitewide
David Hogberg attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos