Author summary
ā 91%1 analyzed article/video608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Goodman results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 1,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ā 77% (1,456 of 6,119 authors). This David Goodman is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
David Goodman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Ideastream Public Media1%
ā 0%Megan Fan Munce1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 77%David Goodman (selected)5%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,824
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Goodman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Goodman vs sitewide
David Goodman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos