Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 1,474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David E. Rosenberg results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 897 hits . Analysis detected 4,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,636 of 9,471 authors). This David E. Rosenberg is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. David E. Rosenberg
Author details
Total words: 5,896
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst