Author summary
46%1 analyzed article/video361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Dwork results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 226 hits. Analysis detected 869 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,083 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (921 of 5,774 authors). This David Dwork is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
David Dwork
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Dwork attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Dwork vs sitewide
David Dwork attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.