BS Summary: These David DiMolfetta results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 527 hits. Analysis detected 2,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (1,257 of 4,606 authors). This David DiMolfetta is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
David DiMolfetta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠73%David DiMolfetta (selected)5%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 2,668
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David DiMolfetta attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David DiMolfetta vs All Other Publications
David DiMolfetta attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.