Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Crane results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 737 hits . Analysis detected 4,582 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,251 of 9,471 authors). This David Crane is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. David Crane
Author details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.8% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.8% 23.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.9% 13.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst