Author summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Clarey results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 1,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,486 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (1,748 of 6,622 authors). This David Clarey is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
David Clarey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠74%David Clarey (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,486
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Clarey attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Clarey vs sitewide
David Clarey attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos