Author summary
7%1 analyzed article/video2,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darwin BondGraham results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 2,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,306 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (5,712 of 5,783 authors). This Darwin BondGraham is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Darwin BondGraham
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Darwin BondGraham attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Darwin BondGraham vs sitewide
Darwin BondGraham attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.