Author summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Bergstrom results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 1,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (1,695 of 5,774 authors). This Danielle Bergstrom is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Danielle Bergstrom
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠71%Danielle Bergstrom (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,788
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Danielle Bergstrom attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Danielle Bergstrom vs sitewide
Danielle Bergstrom attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos