Author summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Perez results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 484 hits. Analysis detected 3,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,371 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (3,512 of 5,867 authors). This Daniel Perez is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Daniel Perez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠41%Daniel Perez (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,371
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Daniel Perez attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Daniel Perez vs sitewide
Daniel Perez attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos