Author summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video1,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Pearson results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 622 hits. Analysis detected 5,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (2,902 of 8,274 authors). This Daniel Pearson is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Daniel Pearson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Jared Counts1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠65%Daniel Pearson (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,368
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Daniel Pearson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Daniel Pearson vs sitewide
Daniel Pearson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos