Author summary
67% 2 analyzed articles/videos 592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel O'Connor results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 587 hits . Analysis detected 2,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,551 of 8,856 authors). This Daniel O'Connor is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Daniel O'Connor
Author details
Total words: 3,316
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst