Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Daniel Felsenthal results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, In-Group Bias, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 1,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 7,163 authors). This Daniel Felsenthal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Daniel Felsenthal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠0%Ken Armstrong1%
⁠1%Franziska Wild1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Daniel Felsenthal (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,360
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Daniel Felsenthal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Daniel Felsenthal vs sitewide
Daniel Felsenthal attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos