Author summary
6% 1 analyzed article/video 810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Griffin results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 153 hits . Analysis detected 1,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (5,902 of 8,603 authors). This Dana Griffin is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Dana Griffin
Author details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst