Author summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Williams results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (177 of 5,157 authors). This Dan Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Dan Williams
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠97%Dan Williams (selected)14%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 612
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dan Williams attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dan Williams vs sitewide
Dan Williams attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos