Author summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Sales results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (1,918 of 6,004 authors). This Dan Sales is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Dan Sales
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠69%Dan Sales (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,157
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dan Sales attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dan Sales vs sitewide
Dan Sales attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos