BS Summary: These Dan Petrella results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,870 hits. Analysis detected 12,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,361 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (4,023 of 4,606 authors). This Dan Petrella is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Dan Petrella
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠13%Dan Petrella (selected)2%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 20,361
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dan Petrella attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dan Petrella vs All Other Publications
Dan Petrella attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.