Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cris Barrish results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 232 hits . Analysis detected 1,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 94% (644 of 9,392 authors). This Cris Barrish is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Cris Barrish
Author details
Total words: 1,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.2% percentile 7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 18.1% 18.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.9% 12.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 18.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst