Author summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CQ-Roll Call results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 178 faulty-reasoning hits from 264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (201 of 6,730 authors). This CQ-Roll Call is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
CQ-Roll Call
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠97%CQ-Roll Call (selected)14%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 264
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
CQ-Roll Call attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
CQ-Roll Call vs sitewide
CQ-Roll Call attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos